Why Authoritarian Regimes Always Fail

China is starting to exhibit the authoritarian syndrome: military starts to resemble the force needed to mount a coup d’etat; oft an internal struggle.  The core elements of a powerful military will be undermined by the, always insecure, dictator.

Russia’s example comes to mind…  Russia has a massive military that was to stomp out, subjugate, the independent country of Ukraine in days… The war is four years old and Russia, by all appearances, is getting destroyed.

The USA has an aristocrat wannabe class driving the merde l’orange (Republican criminal syndicate – RCS) problem: trying to introduce an authoritarian regime in  our own country. This November (hopefully earlier; see Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution) we will get an indication of how much longer this grifter in chief can inflict the authoritarian syndrome/wound.

A couple of things to remember about authoritarian regimes like China, Russia and what’s happening in the USA:

    A strong, capable military isn't possible because a coup d'etat oft originates in    country.

    An economy ruled strictly from the top of the regime is the most demoralizing   thing possible (all decisions are made at the highest levels of the regime, credit is taken by said regime, blame is delegated to any and everybody else). The wheels fall off because the economy is subjugated to the incompetence of the regime.


Authoritarian regimes are still dangerous because they will risk anything, that isn't theirs or themselves, in the process of failing.